|
Complaint against M. HASSAN ROHANI
At the request of :
1) Mr. Ali Mehrsai
Born on September 14, 1950 in Bushehr (Iran)
Current address: STORHAGEN 25
6100 VOLDA (NORWAY)
Citizen of Norway
2) Mr Masoud MARANDI
Born on September 6, 1976
Current address: 56 UXBRIDGE ROAD
LONDON W 12 8 LP (the U.K.)
3) Mrs Sakineh KARAMI MOTAGHI
Born on October 6, 1962 in BAHAR (IRAN)
Current address: STEINDAMM 56
25337 ELMSHORN (GERMANY)
Have the honor of stating to you that:
The applicants of Iranian nationality, left their country of origine and
took refuge in various European countries. They come to learn that Mr.
Hassan ROHANI, the person in charge in Iran for repression of opponents
thru assassination and torture, was residing in France.
Mr. Hassan ROHANI, who is currently in PARIS, is the direct collaborator
of Ayatollah Ali KHAMANEI and President Akbar Hashani RAFSANJANI with
whom he directs the National Security Council which decides
assassinations, acts of terrorism to foreigners and orders the guards of
the Revolution who carry out acts of torture on their opponents.
The terrorist structure in which Hassan ROHANI takes part, thus decided,
planned and organized the assassination of more than one hundred
political opponents, among the most important of which, it is possible
to quote the assassinations of:
-
October 1991, Dr. Cyrus Elahi, former vice-minister
of education, assassinated in Paris.
-
December 1992, Captain Abbas GOLIZADEH, assassinated
in Istanbul.
-
September 1993, three Iranian Kurds were
assassinated in Berlin at the Mykonos restaurant.
-
August 1991, former Prime Minister Shapour Bakhtiar
was assassinated in France.
-
May 1996, Dr. Reza Mazlouman, former vice-minister
of education was assassinated in Paris.
In addition to these assassinations which are directly
ascribable to Hassan ROHANI, he directs the repression of the opponents
who are arrested and tortured.
In a report of 58 pages, established on November 8, 1993 by the United
Nations Human Rights special rapporteur, it is indicated that torture is
used in a regular manner in the Iranian prisons "to obtain consents or
to prepare evidence to accuse people who obviously have no knowledge of
the charges selected". The report is supported by another report dated
November 1998 which states that:
"The prisoners are usually tortured after their
arrest, they can be subjected to torture constantly during their
detention in IRAN. One estimates the number of victims of torture to be
more than 100.000.
"The most common methods of torture used, are suspensions for long
periods in an up-side down position, keeping them up for long periods,
cigarette burns and most frequently repeated and violent blows with
cables and other instruments on the back and the plant of the feet."
The applicants have all been victims of the of Hassan ROHANI.
1) Complaint of Mr. Ali MEHRSAI
Mr. Ali MEHRSAI residing in Norway since 1992, active member of the
organisation of Fedayins of the people of IRAN, was arrested and held in
prison of BUSHEHR (IRAN) on December 26, 1981.
He was forced to stretch out on a bench, on which he was
bound and underwent the torment known as "wet rag", - dirty part of
clothing inserted in the mouth - and was whipped 74 times with an
electric cable on the plant of his feet by several torturers taking
turns, by order of the judiciary.
During the first two months, he received several blows, on the face and
the nape of the neck, kicks to his stomach and in the back, which
resulted in an ulcer. At the end of two months, at the time of his
"trial" he had to deny belonging to his organization, under the threat
of execution the same day. Therefore, he was condemned to 10 years of
prison, with the sentence reduced by 5 years.
The conditions of his detention were particularly painful from June 1982
to March 1983 when he was deprived of all medical care and family visits
in spite of his ulcer and an infection of the skin. On December 11,
1983, he was transferred to KARAAJ (100 km NW of Teheran) where he was
blackmailed to "cooperate" with authorities in exchange for care.
With his stubborn refusal he was deprived of any medical treatment and
placed in isolation, enduring psychological tortures until August 11,
1985. He was transferred again to several prisons and torture centers,
ADELABAD and BUSHEHR where as a consequence of the various daily abuses
he underwent, his nose and its teeth were broken. He was finally
released on December 26, 1986 and succeeded in leaving Iran to find
refuge in Norway.
2) Complaint of Mr. Massoud MARANDI
Massoud MARANDI was arrested when he was a student at
the university of SHIRAZ AZAD where he was studying engineering. He was
imprisoned and beaten with an electric wire, hung by the hands and
beaten with a whip 130 times. He had to sign a document renouncing any
suspect activity. He was then brought to an isolated and backward region
of Iran by car with his eyes blindfolded and he was abandoned after he
was thrown out of the car. He succeeded in escaping from Iran and he
found refuge in England where he currently resides.
3) Complaint of Mrs Sakineh KARAMI MOTAGHI
The plaintiff was arrested in 1982 and 1984 for being
part of the People’s Mojahedeen. In 1999, she was arrested again and put
in detention from July to December. In prison, she was interrogated
under torture, in order to find out to which group she belonged. To
collect this information she was tortured with electrical shocks on the
chest and the head and was burned with cigarettes. She was struck with
electric wire and raped with a bottle. Her body still carries the traces
and the scars of the wounds she received.
Pertaining to Legal Rights:
The Supreme court of appeal has ruled (Cass Crim October 23, 2002) that
articles 689 - 1 and 689 - 2 of the Code of Penal Procedure give
competence to the French jurisdictions to continue and judge any person
who, out of the territory of the Republic has been found guilty of
committing acts of torture.
Moreover, according to article 689 of the Code of Penal Procedure, the
French law is applicable each time the French courts are qualified.
As a result of this, in cases where the French criminal law has the
means to be applied because of the jurisdiction of the transgression,
the law finds a way to apply each time that the judicial competence is
applied.
The plaintiffs, who will be joined by many others, have the honor to
present you a case for crime against humanity, facts envisaged and
repressed by article 212-1 and following the Penal code.
Here you find in your hands the amount of the fee that you would like to
impose.
|